From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LeTona v. City of Modesto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO
Jul 20, 2012
Case No. 1:12-cv-00782-AWI-DLB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 1:12-cv-00782-AWI-DLB

07-20-2012

ROSA LETONA, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MODESTO, a municipal corporation, MODESTO POLICE OFFICERS Brian Ferguson, Individually, Benjamin Kroutil, Individually, Jonathan Griffith, Individually, and Ben Brandvold, Individually, MODESTO POLICE SGT. Daniel Key, in his individual and official capacities, DIGITALDOG AUTO RECOVERY, a California Repossession Agency, and DOES 1 THROUGH 30, Jointly and Severally, Defendants.

SANJAY S. SCHMIDT (State Bar No. 247475) LAW OFFICE OF SANJAY S. SCHMIDT Attorney for Plaintiff Rosa Letona


SANJAY S. SCHMIDT (State Bar No. 247475)

LAW OFFICE OF SANJAY S. SCHMIDT

Attorney for Plaintiff Rosa Letona

ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO

VACATE AND RE-SET INITIAL

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

Having considered Plaintiff's Application, requesting an order vacating and re-setting the Initial Scheduling Conference, and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Application is granted. The Initial Scheduling Conference, set for August 23, 2012, is vacated. The Scheduling Conference is re-set to November 19, 2012, at 9:00 am, in Courtroom #9. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dennis L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

LeTona v. City of Modesto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO
Jul 20, 2012
Case No. 1:12-cv-00782-AWI-DLB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2012)
Case details for

LeTona v. City of Modesto

Case Details

Full title:ROSA LETONA, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MODESTO, a municipal corporation…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO

Date published: Jul 20, 2012

Citations

Case No. 1:12-cv-00782-AWI-DLB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2012)