From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lesser v. Craig

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Oct 15, 1912
127 P. 1117 (Okla. 1912)

Opinion

No. 2104

Opinion Filed October 15, 1912.

Error from Oklahoma County Court; Sam Hooker, Judge.

Action in replevin by Fair Craig, plaintiff below, defendant in error, against David Lesser, defendant below, plaintiff in error, to recover two mules. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Affirmed.

Lee F. Wilson and E. G. Wilson, for plaintiff in error.

W. F. Wilson and John Tomerlin, for defendant in error.


The only error assigned is that the court erred in directing a verdict for the plaintiff, but this cannot be considered for two reasons. The case-made was not served within the time allowed by the order of the court, and, therefore, cannot be considered, and no motion for new trial was filed by the defendant. The case should, therefore, be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Lesser v. Craig

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Oct 15, 1912
127 P. 1117 (Okla. 1912)
Case details for

Lesser v. Craig

Case Details

Full title:LESSER v. CRAIG

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Oct 15, 1912

Citations

127 P. 1117 (Okla. 1912)
127 P. 1117