From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leslie v. Thomas F. Farrell, P.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jul 24, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00536-PAB-CBS (D. Colo. Jul. 24, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00536-PAB-CBS

07-24-2012

MARK ALAN LESLIE, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS F. FARRELL, P.C., d.b.a. Farrell & Seldin, a Colorado Law Firm, THOMAS F. FARRELL, Atty. Reg. #9712, BARRY A. SELDIN, Atty. Reg. #14699, PAMELA J. DOTSON, Atty. Reg. #38321, and IAN T. BALLARD, Atty. Reg. #38312, Defendants.


Judge Philip A. Brimmer


ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer filed on July 6, 2012 [Docket No. 12]. The Recommendation states that objections to the Recommendation must be filed within fourteen days after its service on the parties. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The Recommendation was served on July 6, 2012. No party has objected to the Recommendation.

In the absence of an objection, the district court may review a magistrate judge's recommendation under any standard it deems appropriate. See Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985) ("[i]t does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate's factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings"). In this matter, the Court has reviewed the Recommendation to satisfy itself that there is "no clear error on the face of the record." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), Advisory Committee Notes. Based on this review, the Court has concluded that the Recommendation is a correct application of the facts and the law. Accordingly, it is

This standard of review is something less than a "clearly erroneous or contrary to law" standard of review, Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), which in turn is less than a de novo review. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

ORDERED as follows:

1. The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [Docket No. 12] is ACCEPTED.

2. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1692k(a)(3) [Docket No. 7] is denied.

BY THE COURT:

____________

PHILIP A. BRIMMER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Leslie v. Thomas F. Farrell, P.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jul 24, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00536-PAB-CBS (D. Colo. Jul. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Leslie v. Thomas F. Farrell, P.C.

Case Details

Full title:MARK ALAN LESLIE, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS F. FARRELL, P.C., d.b.a. Farrell …

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jul 24, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00536-PAB-CBS (D. Colo. Jul. 24, 2012)