From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leslie v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia.
Sep 12, 2016
299 Ga. 636 (Ga. 2016)

Opinion

S16A0992

09-12-2016

Leslie v. The State.

Nicholas D. Leslie, GDC# 1034212, Georgia State Prison 2164 Georgia Hwy. 147, Reidsville, Georgia 30499, for Appellant. Patricia B. Attaway Burton, Deputy Attorney General, Paula Khristian Smith, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Samuel S. Olens, Attorney General, Department of Law, 40 Capitol Square, S.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30334, Tracy Graham Lawson, District Attorney, Elizabeth A. Baker, Deputy Chief A.D.A., Clayton County District Attorney's Office, 9151 Tara Boulevard, Fourth Floor Jonesboro, Georgia 30236, for Appellee.


Nicholas D. Leslie, GDC# 1034212, Georgia State Prison 2164 Georgia Hwy. 147, Reidsville, Georgia 30499, for Appellant.

Patricia B. Attaway Burton, Deputy Attorney General, Paula Khristian Smith, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Samuel S. Olens, Attorney General, Department of Law, 40 Capitol Square, S.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30334, Tracy Graham Lawson, District Attorney, Elizabeth A. Baker, Deputy Chief A.D.A., Clayton County District Attorney's Office, 9151 Tara Boulevard, Fourth Floor Jonesboro, Georgia 30236, for Appellee.

HUNSTEIN, Justice.Appellant Nicholas Leslie appeals from the denial of what he styled as a “Motion to Void Illegal Sentence.” We affirm.

In September 1999, Leslie pleaded guilty to malice murder and was sentenced to life imprisonment. In June 2015, he filed a “Motion to Void Illegal Sentence.” In an accompanying brief, Leslie argued that his sentence was void because, among other reasons, he received ineffective assistance of counsel and his plea was involuntary. The trial court construed the pleading as an untimely motion to withdraw a guilty plea and dismissed it. On appeal, Leslie reiterates those claims raised below.

Leslie's motion, which failed to assert any argument relevant to a void-sentence claim, was properly construed as a motion to withdraw a guilty plea. See, e.g., von Thomas v. State, 293 Ga. 569, 572, 748 S.E.2d 446 (2013) (“[A] defendant cannot assert a claim that his conviction was unlawful in an untimely motion to vacate his sentence simply by dressing it up as a claim that his sentence was void.”). However, a motion to withdraw a guilty plea “must be filed within the same term of court at which the guilty plea or judgment being challenged was entered.” See Hagan v. State, 290 Ga. 353, 353, 720 S.E.2d 645 (2012). “[A]fter the expiration of the term and of the time for filing an appeal from the conviction, the only remedy available to the defendant for withdrawing a plea is through habeas corpus proceedings.” (Citations omitted.) Harris v. State, 278 Ga. 805, 806, 606 S.E.2d 248 (2004). Leslie's motion cannot, however, be construed as a habeas corpus petition because it was filed in the wrong county, see OCGA § 9–14–43, and outside the four-year limitations period imposed for such petitions, see OCGA § 9–14–42 (c). Accordingly, Leslie's motion was properly dismissed as an untimely motion to withdraw a guilty plea. See Davis v. State, 274 Ga. 865, 865, 561 S.E.2d 119 (2002).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.


Summaries of

Leslie v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia.
Sep 12, 2016
299 Ga. 636 (Ga. 2016)
Case details for

Leslie v. State

Case Details

Full title:Leslie v. The State.

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia.

Date published: Sep 12, 2016

Citations

299 Ga. 636 (Ga. 2016)
791 S.E.2d 49

Citing Cases

Sanders v. State

" Leslie v. State , 299 Ga. 636, 636, 791 S.E.2d 49 (2016) (citation and punctuation omitted). When the term…