From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leslie v. Kernan

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 7, 2006
No. CIV S-06-1647 LKK CMK P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-1647 LKK CMK P.

August 7, 2006


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner has also filed a request for appointment of counsel. In his application, petitioner challenges a conviction issued by the Fresno County Superior Court. Fresno County is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 3-120(d).

Pursuant to Local Rule 3-120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper division of a court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court. This court will not rule on petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This court has not ruled on petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis;

2. This action and all pending motion are transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and

3. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at:

United States District Court Eastern District of California 2500 Tulare Street Fresno, CA 93721


Summaries of

Leslie v. Kernan

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 7, 2006
No. CIV S-06-1647 LKK CMK P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2006)
Case details for

Leslie v. Kernan

Case Details

Full title:DARNELL DESHAN LESLIE, Petitioner, v. SCOTT KERNAN, Warden, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 7, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-06-1647 LKK CMK P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2006)