Opinion
Case No: C 11-3851 SBA.
October 6, 2011
ORDER Dkt. 20
On August 5, 2011, Plaintiff filed a request for permission to e-file. Dkt. 3. On September 20, 2011, the Court found that Plaintiff had not presented any compelling reasons to be exempted from the rules applicable to pro se litigants that they are not permitted to e-file, and therefore denied her request to e-file. Dkt. 17. On September 27, 2011, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court's order denying her request to e-file. Dkt. 20. Plaintiff asserts that she has the technology to e-file, but presents no compelling reason to exempt her from rules precluding pro se litigants from e-filing. Given that Plaintiff's complaint is in excess of 80 pages, the Court finds that Plaintiff is not a good candidate for e-filing. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT that Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of this Court's order denying her request to e-file is DENIED. This order terminates Docket 20.
IT IS SO ORDERED.