From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lesko v. Frankford Hospital-Bucks County

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District
Dec 24, 2009
986 A.2d 62 (Pa. 2009)

Opinion

Nos. 112 MAL 2009, 113 MAL 2009.

December 24, 2009.

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court, Nos. 112 113 MAL 2009.

Prior report: Pa.Super, 964 A.2d 932.


ORDER


AND NOW, this 24th day of December, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioners, are:

Whether the Superior Court's decision that the Settlement Agreement and Release requires Petitioners to pay [respondent's] estate an additional lump sum of $1,660,110, contravenes controlling Pennsylvania Supreme Court law governing contract interpretation and also Superior Court's own precedent, where:

(i) there is no language anywhere in the four corners of the contract stating that Petitioners are required to pay the [respondent's] estate an additional lump sum of $1,660,110 if, and after she died;

(ii) the Superior Court improperly made its own fact-finding on appeal in violation of controlling principles of appellate jurisdiction and procedure, when it found that Petitioners "drafted the contract" (a fact which even the trial court itself did not and could not find), causing the Superior Court to improperly construe the contract against the supposed "drafter" which corrupted the entire legal reasoning of its decision;

(iii) the Superior Court otherwise misapplied this Court's controlling legal precedent for construing a contract against a drafter, said rule which would apply only if there is an ambiguity, and the Superior Court itself inconsistently purported that there was no ambiguity;

(iv) the Superior Court misapplied this Court's doctrine of impracticability/impossibility, without citation to any authority, to impermissibly judicially create a new contract obligation, when the doctrine applies only to instances to excuse performance; and

(v) the Superior Court disregarded entirely this Court's controlling precedent that specific provisions control general provisions in construing a contract, which forecloses any possibility of reading into this contract language stating that Petitioners shall pay the [respondent's] estate an additional lump sum of $1,660,110.


Summaries of

Lesko v. Frankford Hospital-Bucks County

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District
Dec 24, 2009
986 A.2d 62 (Pa. 2009)
Case details for

Lesko v. Frankford Hospital-Bucks County

Case Details

Full title:Jeanne LESKO, as Executrix of The Estate of Kathleen Bernath, Respondent…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District

Date published: Dec 24, 2009

Citations

986 A.2d 62 (Pa. 2009)
986 A.2d 62

Citing Cases

Lesko v. Frankford Hospital-Bucks County

Appellants appealed, and the Superior Court affirmed, finding the duty to pay the $1.6 million to obtain an…