From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leskey v. Department of Revenue, State

Tax Court of Oregon
Jan 30, 2018
TC-MD 170255N (Or. T.C. Jan. 30, 2018)

Opinion

TC-MD 170255N

01-30-2018

TAMMI L. LESKEY, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant.


FINAL DECISION OF DISMISSAL ]

This Final Decision of Dismissal incorporates without change the court's Decision of Dismissal, entered January 11, 2018. The court did not receive a statement of costs and disbursements within 14 days after its Decision of Dismissal was entered. See Tax Court Rule-Magistrate Division (TCR-MD) 16 C(1).

ALLISON R. BOOMER MAGISTRATE

This matter came before the court on its own motion to dismiss.

In her Complaint, filed July 7, 2017, Plaintiff identified the tax year appealed as "2013, " but did not include a copy of the notice she was appealing. During the first case management conference held November 1, 2017, Plaintiff stated that she intended to appeal the 2012 and 2013 tax years. The parties also requested a second case management conference, which the court initially set for 9:00 a.m. on December 12, 2017.

On November 2, 2017, the court issued a Journal Entry, instructing Plaintiff to use the Magistrate Division's Amended Complaint form if she wished to include an additional tax year in her appeal. Plaintiff also was instructed to attach copies of the notices she wanted to appeal for each tax year.

On December 4, 2017, after confirming Plaintiff's availability, the court rescheduled the second case management conference for 9:45 a.m. on December 13, 2017. Plaintiff failed to appear. The court issued an Order on December 15, 2017, requiring Plaintiff to file a written response within 14 days and explain why she failed to appear and why she had not filed an amended complaint or provided the court with copies of the notices for the tax years she is appealing. Plaintiff did not file a response with the court within the time allowed.

This court has authority to enforce its order by sanctions, including but not limited to, dismissal of a case. Tax Court Rule-Magistrate Division (TCR-MD) 21. Considering Plaintiff's failure to comply with the court's Order, dismissal is appropriate here. Now, therefore, IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that Plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

Leskey v. Department of Revenue, State

Tax Court of Oregon
Jan 30, 2018
TC-MD 170255N (Or. T.C. Jan. 30, 2018)
Case details for

Leskey v. Department of Revenue, State

Case Details

Full title:TAMMI L. LESKEY, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon…

Court:Tax Court of Oregon

Date published: Jan 30, 2018

Citations

TC-MD 170255N (Or. T.C. Jan. 30, 2018)