From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leroux v. Bank of Am., N.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
May 13, 2016
192 So. 3d 546 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 5D15–1039.

05-13-2016

Natalie LEROUX, Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Appellee.

Nicholas A. Vidoni, of Watson, Soileau, Deleo, Burgett & Pickles, P.A., Cocoa, for Appellant. Nancy M. Wallace, of Akerman LLP, Tallahassee; William P. Heller, of Akerman LLP, Fort Lauderdale; and Celia C. Falzone, of Akerman LLP, Jacksonville, for Appellee.


Nicholas A. Vidoni, of Watson, Soileau, Deleo, Burgett & Pickles, P.A., Cocoa, for Appellant.

Nancy M. Wallace, of Akerman LLP, Tallahassee; William P. Heller, of Akerman LLP, Fort Lauderdale; and Celia C. Falzone, of Akerman LLP, Jacksonville, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that under the facts of this case, the trial court abused its discretion in denying the unopposed motion to vacate foreclosure sale. The record reflects that the parties had not engaged in dilatory tactics and that granting the motion would not have unduly interfered with the efficient administration of justice. See Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Lupica, 36 So.3d 875, 876 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

PALMER, EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Leroux v. Bank of Am., N.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
May 13, 2016
192 So. 3d 546 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Leroux v. Bank of Am., N.A.

Case Details

Full title:Natalie LEROUX, Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: May 13, 2016

Citations

192 So. 3d 546 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)