From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lerman v. Muller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1924
210 App. Div. 860 (N.Y. App. Div. 1924)

Opinion

October, 1924.


Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. While we are loath to interfere with the discretion of the court at Special Term in matters of this character, we feel that this case presents a situation in which the motion should have been granted. ( Regan v. Milliken Bros., 123 App. Div. 72; Holtzoff v. Dodge Olcott Co., 134 id. 353.) Kelly, P.J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Kelby, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lerman v. Muller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1924
210 App. Div. 860 (N.Y. App. Div. 1924)
Case details for

Lerman v. Muller

Case Details

Full title:JACOB LERMAN, Respondent, v. EMIL ALFRED MULLER, Appellant, Impleaded with…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1924

Citations

210 App. Div. 860 (N.Y. App. Div. 1924)

Citing Cases

Waskovitz v. Persky

Plaintiff has not satisfactorily explained her neglect to prosecute this action and the discretion of the…

Mormon v. Farrell

Plaintiff has not satisfactorily explained his neglect to prosecute this action and the discretion of the…