From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lerma v. Pfiefer

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 31, 2021
2:17-cv-01421-VBF (SHK) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2021)

Opinion

2:17-cv-01421-VBF (SHK)

10-31-2021

ARTHUR PETER LERMA, Petitioner, v. CHRISTINE PFIEFER, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

HON. VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition (“FAP”), the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the FAP is DENIED and that Judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.


Summaries of

Lerma v. Pfiefer

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 31, 2021
2:17-cv-01421-VBF (SHK) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2021)
Case details for

Lerma v. Pfiefer

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR PETER LERMA, Petitioner, v. CHRISTINE PFIEFER, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Oct 31, 2021

Citations

2:17-cv-01421-VBF (SHK) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2021)