Opinion
2:23-cv-00924
01-17-2024
Dale A. Kimball District Judge
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (DOC. NO. 2)
Daphne A. Oberg Magistrate Judge
Before the court is Plaintiff Lequante H.'smotion to proceed in forma pauperis (without paying fees). Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, a federal court may authorize commencement of an action without prepayment of fees by a person who is unable to pay such fees.To proceed in forma pauperis under section 1915, Ms. H. must show a financial inability to pay the required filing fee.
Pursuant to best practices in the District of Utah addressing privacy concerns in certain cases, including social security cases, the court refers to Plaintiff by her first name and last initial only.
(Doc. No. 2.)
Lister v. Dep't of Treasury, 408 F.3d 1309, 1312 (10th Cir. 2005).
Although Ms. H. reports she is unemployed, she reports her gross monthly income exceeds 200% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines based on her household size, and therefore she has not shown a financial inability to pay the required filing fee. Accordingly, the undersigned RECOMMENDSthe district judge DENY the motion.
IFP status is generally denied through a report and recommendation issued by a magistrate judge. See, e.g., Johnson v. Hertz Corp., No. 22-6092, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 29345, at *2 (10th Cir. Oct. 21, 2022) (unpublished) (affirming IFP denial based on a magistrate judge's report and recommendation adopted by the district court).
(Doc. No. 2.)
The undersigned further RECOMMENDS Ms. H be given thirty days in which to pay the filing fee. The court will send copies of this Report and Recommendation to Ms. H, who the court notifies of her right to object to it.Ms. H. must file any objection to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen days. Failure to object may constitute waiver of objections upon subsequent review.