From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lepley v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Oct 16, 2015
No. 66889 (Nev. Oct. 16, 2015)

Opinion

No. 66889

10-16-2015

BRIAN EUGENE LEPLEY, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA ON RELATION OF THE NDOC, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER OF REVERSAL AND REMAND

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order dismissing a civil rights action for lack of jurisdiction. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Rob Bare, Judge.

For the State's waiver of sovereign immunity to apply under NRS 41.031(2), actions brought against the State of Nevada "must be filed in the county where the cause or some part thereof arose or in Carson City." The district court dismissed appellant's complaint on the basis that he failed to strictly comply with NRS 41.031(2) by filing his civil rights complaint in the Eighth Judicial District rather than the First, Sixth, or Seventh Judicial Districts. Appellant challenges the district court's order on appeal and respondent has filed a response as directed by this court.

Having reviewed appellant's appeal statement, respondent's response, and the record on appeal, we conclude that the district court erred in dismissing appellant's complaint. Ogawa v. Ogawa, 125 Nev. 660, 667, 221 P.3d 699, 704 (2009) (applying de novo review to an issue of jurisdiction). Appellant's civil rights complaint alleges that respondent has failed to comply with the requirements of a settlement agreement to restore good time credits to appellant, and that appellant has sought compliance with the settlement agreement through the inmate grievance process. A review of the record on appeal shows that at least several of the inmate grievance forms attached to appellant's complaint were submitted and/or returned to appellant while he was incarcerated at High Desert State Prison, which is located in Clark County. As such, appellant complied with NRS 41.031(2)'s jurisdictional requirement by filing his complaint in the Eighth Judicial District. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court REVERSED AND REMAND this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with this order.

/s/_________, J.

Saitta

/s/_________, J.

Gibbons

/s/_________, J.

Pickering
cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge

Brian Eugene Lepley

Attorney General/Carson City

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Lepley v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Oct 16, 2015
No. 66889 (Nev. Oct. 16, 2015)
Case details for

Lepley v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN EUGENE LEPLEY, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA ON RELATION OF THE…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Oct 16, 2015

Citations

No. 66889 (Nev. Oct. 16, 2015)