LePatner Project Sols. v. 320 W. 115 St., LLC

2 Citing cases

  1. Katsky Korins LLP v. Moskovits

    198 A.D.3d 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)   Cited 3 times

    The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $209,836.44, with statutory interest from September 11, 2019. Plaintiff law firm Katsky Korins LLP established entitlement to summary judgment on its claim for an account stated with respect to its June invoices by production of documentary evidence showing defendants received the June invoices and defendants' admissions in their answer that they made partial payments for those invoices ( LePatner Project Solutions LLC v. 320 W. 115 St., 192 A.D.3d 507, 508, 140 N.Y.S.3d 407 [1st Dept. 2021] ; Law Off. of Mark S. Helweil v. Karambelas, 190 A.D.3d 560, 560, 136 N.Y.S.3d 705 [1st Dept. 2021] ). Plaintiff also established entitlement to summary judgment on its account stated claim with respect to the July invoices.

  2. Scarola Zubatov & Schaffzin PLLC v. Rocketfuel Blockchain, Inc.

    2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 32364 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2023)

    give rise to an account stated" (LePatner Project Sols. LLC v 320 W. 115 St., LLC, 192 A.D.3d 507, 508, 140 N.Y.S.3d 407 (Mem) [1st Dept 2021] [internal quotations and citation omitted]). "In the context of an account stated pertaining to legal fees, a firm does not have to establish the reasonableness of its fee because the client's act of holding the statement without objection will be construed as acquiescence as to its correctness" (Lapidus & Assoc., LLP v Elizabeth St., Inc., 92 A.D.3d 405, 405-06, 937 N.Y.S.2d 227 [1st Dept 2012]).