Opinion
Civil Action 20-3344 (JDB)
03-30-2023
MOHAMMED NAZIR BIN LEP, Petitioner, v. JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR., et al., Respondents.
ORDER
JOHN D. BATES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, upon consideration of [107] petitioner's motion for discovery and [113] respondents' motion to dismiss, for judgment, or to abstain with respect to Claims IX and X of [40] the habeas petition, and the entire record herein, it is hereby
ORDERED that [113] respondents' motion is GRANTED; it is further
ORDERED that with respect to Claim X, JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of respondents; it is further
ORDERED that with respect to Claim IX, any aspect of that claim challenging past or current conditions of confinement is DISMISSED and any aspect of that claim challenging the factual predicate of detention is HELD IN ABEYANCE pending resolution of the military commission proceedings; and it is further
ORDERED that [107] petitioner's motion is DENIED as moot or premature.
SO ORDERED.