From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LEOPOLDSTADT v. KANN

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 1912
150 App. Div. 914 (N.Y. App. Div. 1912)

Opinion

May, 1912.

Present — Ingraham, P.J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Miller, JJ.


The plaintiff should have been permitted to amend his complaint. Although he has been a little slow in discovering the deficiencies of his present complaint, there is no suggestion that he has been guilty of bad faith. ( Muller v. City of Philadelphia, 113 App. Div. 92; People v. Ostrander, 144 id. 860.) The order appealed from must, therefore, be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted upon payment by plaintiff of thirty dollars trial fee and ten dollars costs of motion.


Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted on payment by plaintiff of thirty dollars trial fee and ten dollars costs of motion.


Summaries of

LEOPOLDSTADT v. KANN

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 1912
150 App. Div. 914 (N.Y. App. Div. 1912)
Case details for

LEOPOLDSTADT v. KANN

Case Details

Full title:ABRAHAM LEOPOLDSTADT, Appellant, v . MAURICE KANN, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 1, 1912

Citations

150 App. Div. 914 (N.Y. App. Div. 1912)