From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leopold v. Nangalama

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 2, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-0846 JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 2, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-0846 JFM (PC).

May 2, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(a). Plaintiff will be provided the opportunity either to submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or to submit the appropriate filing fee.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the appropriate filing fee; plaintiff's failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this action; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner.

DATED: April 29, 2011. SUBMISSION OF IFP or FILING FEE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff, No. 2:#cv- vs. Defendants. Plaintiff hereby submits the following document in compliance with the court's order filed _________: __________ IFP affidavit __________ The appropriate filing fee DATED: _____________________________ Plaintiff


Summaries of

Leopold v. Nangalama

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 2, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-0846 JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 2, 2011)
Case details for

Leopold v. Nangalama

Case Details

Full title:CARL LEOPOLD, Plaintiff, v. A. NANGALAMA, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 2, 2011

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-0846 JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 2, 2011)