From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leopard v. Leopard

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 28, 1985
464 So. 2d 632 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

No. 84-165.

February 28, 1985.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Seminole County, Dominick J. Salfi, J.

O.H. Eaton, Jr., and Nancy F. Alley of Freeman, Eaton Fountain, Altamonte Springs, for appellant.


The wife appeals from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. She contends that the court abused its discretion in failing to award her a greater amount of permanent alimony.

This was a thirty-three year marriage. The husband, age fifty-four, is retired from the military and not otherwise employed. He has a weekly income of $436.00 in military and social security benefits. The wife, age fifty-two, is employed as a telephone operator earning $137.00 per week. Because of her physical condition and a lack of other skills, the wife's present occupation is the limit of her expectations.

The court awarded the wife $75.00 per week in permanent alimony, leaving the husband with $361.00 per week and the wife with $212.00 per week including her wages. We find this award, which results in a disparity of approximately $600.00 per month in the parties' income, to be facially insufficient and reverse. See Vandergriff v. Vandergriff, 456 So.2d 464 (Fla. 1984); Cowan v. Cowan, 389 So.2d 1187 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980), rev. denied, 397 So.2d 777 (Fla. 1981). Upon remand the court should award at least $50.00 more per week.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ORFINGER and SHARP, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Leopard v. Leopard

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 28, 1985
464 So. 2d 632 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Leopard v. Leopard

Case Details

Full title:CAROLYN J. LEOPARD, APPELLANT, v. HENRY E. LEOPARD, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Feb 28, 1985

Citations

464 So. 2d 632 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Citing Cases

Rook v. Rook

In addition, the child support award in this case is "facially inadequate" or "facially insufficient." See…