From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leonard v. Walter Davenport Sons, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 25, 1973
41 A.D.2d 526 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)

Opinion

January 25, 1973


Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered on March 29, 1972, unanimously reversed, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, and appellant's motion to amend its answer is granted, without costs and without disbursements, on condition that appellant pay the sum of $250 in costs, within 20 days of service upon it by respondents of a copy of the order entered hereon, and serves its amended answer within that same period. This action was commenced September 29, 1969, and issue joined February 6, 1970. Appellant asserts that it only learned of the availability of the Statute of Limitations as a possible defense in or about May, 1970. Appellant states no valid reason for the delay in moving to amend its answer and for that reason additional costs are imposed. Moreover, it is the policy of the law that leave to amend shall be freely granted upon such terms as may be just (CPLR 3025, subd. [b]). The amended complaint merely alleged that the causes of action accrued prior to August 17, 1968. In that posture of the pleadings and the causes of action set forth, no prejudice to plaintiffs is shown for if the proposed amendment has validity, there are no measures which plaintiffs could have taken to avoid its effect.

Concur — Stevens, P.J., McGivern, Markewich, Murphy and Tilzer, JJ.


Summaries of

Leonard v. Walter Davenport Sons, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 25, 1973
41 A.D.2d 526 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)
Case details for

Leonard v. Walter Davenport Sons, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL LEONARD et al., Respondents, v. WALTER DAVENPORT SONS, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 25, 1973

Citations

41 A.D.2d 526 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)

Citing Cases

Maiolo v. De Mare

We have repeatedly held that where a case has long been certified ready for trial, the moving party must…

Fahey v. County of Ontario

In the status of this case at the time the motion was made, there could be no question of prejudice to the…