From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leonard v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Dec 14, 1926
110 So. 694 (Ala. Crim. App. 1926)

Opinion

6 Div. 64.

December 14, 1926.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Pickens County; John McKinley, Judge.

Bob Leonard was convicted of possessing prohibited liquor, and he appeals. Affirmed.

The judgment entry recites:

"Thereupon came a jury of 12 good and lawful men, to wit, J. M. Stokes, foreman, and 11 others, who, being impaneled, charged, and sworn, according to law, upon their oath do say, 'We, the jury, find the defendant guilty, as charged in the indictment, and assess a fine against him of $50.' It is therefore considered by the court and it is the order and judgment of the court that the defendant, Bob Leonard, is guilty of violating the prohibition law, and that he pay a fine of $50, together with the costs in this case."

Geo. O. Miller, of Livingston, for appellant.

The judgment is incomplete; it should show that "thereupon came a jury of good and lawful men," etc., and should show an adjudication of guilt "as charged in the indictment." The evidence is insufficient to support a judgment of conviction. Gay v. State, 19 Ala. App. 238; 96 So. 646; Gilmore v. State, 99 Ala. 154, 13 So. 536.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., for the State.

Brief of counsel did not reach the Reporter.


Appellant was indicted, tried, and convicted of violating the prohibition law and was duly sentenced to perform hard labor for the county. From the judgment of conviction, he appealed.

No questions are presented for the consideration of this court, except the record proper, as no exceptions were reserved pending the trial. No special charges were requested, nor was there a motion for a new trial. The question of the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction is not presented, as the affirmative charge was not requested. However, such request, if made, would, of necessity, have been denied, as the evidence was in conflict and presented a jury question.

The insistence here made by counsel for appellant that the judgment contained in this record was insufficient, as such, is wholly without merit. The judgment meets every requirement of law, and the record proper, as a whole, is regular and without error. The judgment of the circuit court, from which this appeal was taken, is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Leonard v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Dec 14, 1926
110 So. 694 (Ala. Crim. App. 1926)
Case details for

Leonard v. State

Case Details

Full title:LEONARD v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Dec 14, 1926

Citations

110 So. 694 (Ala. Crim. App. 1926)
21 Ala. App. 610