From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leonard v. Sherman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 14, 2020
Case No. 5:19-cv-00501-RGK (SHK) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 14, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 5:19-cv-00501-RGK (SHK)

04-14-2020

CHAD C. LEONARD, Petitioner, v. STUART SHERMAN, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

Pursuant to Title 28 of the United States Code, section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the R&R to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge with the following exception: Page 8, lines 24-26 of the R&R are amended to read, "Pet. Mem. at 6, if the state court's denial was based on an implicit finding that state law did not require that this instruction be given or that any error in that regard was harmless as a matter of state law, this Court is bound by and may not revisit that determination. See Bradshaw v. Richey, 546 U.S. 74, 76 (2006) (per curiam)."

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered (1) DENYING the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus; and (2) DISMISSING this action with prejudice. Dated: April 14, 2020

/s/_________

HONORABLE R. GARY KLAUSNER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Leonard v. Sherman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 14, 2020
Case No. 5:19-cv-00501-RGK (SHK) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 14, 2020)
Case details for

Leonard v. Sherman

Case Details

Full title:CHAD C. LEONARD, Petitioner, v. STUART SHERMAN, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 14, 2020

Citations

Case No. 5:19-cv-00501-RGK (SHK) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 14, 2020)