From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leonard v. Amaro

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 8, 2007
No. 2:06-cv-2236-MCE-GGH-P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2007)

Opinion

No. 2:06-cv-2236-MCE-GGH-P.

March 8, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On December 15, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

Although it appears from the file that plaintiff's copy of the findings and recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff's responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times.

Pursuant to Local Rule 83-182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 15, 2006, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed.


Summaries of

Leonard v. Amaro

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 8, 2007
No. 2:06-cv-2236-MCE-GGH-P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2007)
Case details for

Leonard v. Amaro

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD LaROYCE LEONARD, Plaintiff, v. LT. M. AMARO, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 8, 2007

Citations

No. 2:06-cv-2236-MCE-GGH-P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2007)