From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leonard v. Abingdon Motor Company, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, N.D
Dec 7, 1971
339 F. Supp. 218 (E.D. Tenn. 1971)

Opinion

Civ. A. No. 2810.

December 7, 1971.

Wendal D. Jackson, Bristol, Tenn., for plaintiffs.

Dick L. Johnson, Johnson City, Tenn., for defendant Abingdon Motor Co.

Joseph O. Fuller, Kingsport, Tenn., for defendant Ford Motor Co.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


This is an action purportedly between citizens of different states with the required jurisdictional amount present. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1), (c). The defendant Abingdon Motor Company (Abingdon) undertook to remove it from a state court. 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a). Its codefendant Ford Motor Company did not join in the removal.

The defendant Abingdon filed a motion to dismiss the action for insufficient service of process. Rule 12(b)(5), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In considering such motion, the Court is obliged to notice its apparent want of jurisdiction on its own motion. Williams v. W.R. Grace Company, D.C. Tenn. (1966), 252 F. Supp. 821, 823, [7]. "* * * Where several defendants are jointly sued in a state court on a joint cause of action, the suit, as a general rule, may not be removed to federal court on diversity grounds unless all the defendants join in the removal. * * *" Bradley v. Maryland Casualty Company, C.A. 8th (1967), 382 F.2d 415, 419; see also 1A Moore's Federal Practice (2d ed.) 1171-1172, ¶ 0.168[3.-2].

Unless the defendant Abingdon shall show within 20 days herefrom why this action was not removed improvidently and without jurisdiction, it will be remanded to the state court whence it came upon an appropriate order regarding the cost of removal. 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c).


Summaries of

Leonard v. Abingdon Motor Company, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, N.D
Dec 7, 1971
339 F. Supp. 218 (E.D. Tenn. 1971)
Case details for

Leonard v. Abingdon Motor Company, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Lawrence LEONARD et al., Plaintiffs, v. ABINGDON MOTOR COMPANY, Inc., et…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, N.D

Date published: Dec 7, 1971

Citations

339 F. Supp. 218 (E.D. Tenn. 1971)

Citing Cases

United Steelworkers of America v. Jarl Extrusions, Inc.

Where the parties fail to raise any jurisdictional question, the Court is obliged to notice want of…

Printing Specialties v. International Printing

The United States district courts are not courts of general jurisdiction; rather, they have only such…