From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leon v. Lukash

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 23, 1991
178 A.D.2d 583 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

December 23, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Thompson, J.H.O.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff Stephen Leon was hired by the Nassau County Medical Examiner's Office in February 1981 as a Deputy Medical Examiner (hereinafter DME), a position classified as noncompetitive and confidential. Leon was subsequently discharged from the position, without a hearing, in December 1981.

Leon claims that his employment was improperly terminated because he was not afforded the pre-termination hearing guaranteed by sections 10-1 and 10-2 of the 1979-1981 collective bargaining agreement between the defendant County of Nassau and the plaintiff Civil Service Employees Association (hereinafter CSEA). The County contends that an employee in Leon's confidential classification was essentially an employee-at-will. Those confidential employees were excluded from the classes of employees who were granted the pre-termination hearing rights under Civil Service Law § 75 and County Government Law of Nassau County § 1305-a, incorporated into the agreement.

Upon review of, inter alia, the hearing testimony and the documentary evidence, we find that it was not the parties' intent to afford confidential employees such as Leon pre-termination hearing rights (see, Breed v Insurance Co., 46 N.Y.2d 351, 355; see also, State of New York v Home Indem. Co., 66 N.Y.2d 669, 671; 22 N.Y. Jur 2d, Contracts, § 196 et seq.). Moreover, ambiguity in a contract, if any, should be resolved against the drafter, here the CSEA (see, Rentways, Inc. v O'Neill Milk Cream Co., 308 N.Y. 342; see also, Lai Ling Cheng v Modansky Leasing Co., 73 N.Y.2d 454, 460; 22 N.Y. Jur 2d, Contracts, § 228). For these reasons, we find that Leon was not improperly discharged from his position and is thus not entitled to reinstatement and back pay.

We have examined Leon's remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Mangano, P.J., Kunzeman, Eiber and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Leon v. Lukash

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 23, 1991
178 A.D.2d 583 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Leon v. Lukash

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN LEON, Appellant, et al., Plaintiff, v. LESLIE LUKASH et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 23, 1991

Citations

178 A.D.2d 583 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
577 N.Y.S.2d 478

Citing Cases

New Rochelle Police Superior officers Ass'n v. City of New Rochelle

t to provide the benefits of Retirement and Social Security Law § 302 (9) (d) to Tier I employees. Absent any…

Ahmad v. Nassau Health Care Corp.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. Construing the complaint in the…