From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LENZ v. DYNETECH CORPORATION

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Apr 4, 2006
Case No. 6:05-cv-792-Orl-31KRS (M.D. Fla. Apr. 4, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 6:05-cv-792-Orl-31KRS.

April 4, 2006


ORDER


The parties in this case executed a Mediation Settlement Agreement on February 22, 2006. Subsequently, a dispute arose over the addition of a confidentiality provision demanded by the Plaintiff. The Agreement itself requires that Plaintiff shall keep the terms and conditions of the Agreement confidential. Defendant has filed a Motion to enforce the Agreement (Doc. 36).

Counsel for both parties to this dispute are experienced and must know that the Court will not approve a confidential settlement of an FLSA claim. Since confidentiality appears to be a material (and disputed) term of this Agreement, it will not be enforced. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

LENZ v. DYNETECH CORPORATION

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Apr 4, 2006
Case No. 6:05-cv-792-Orl-31KRS (M.D. Fla. Apr. 4, 2006)
Case details for

LENZ v. DYNETECH CORPORATION

Case Details

Full title:SEYMOUR "SIM" LENZ, JR., Plaintiff, v. DYNETECH CORPORATION, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division

Date published: Apr 4, 2006

Citations

Case No. 6:05-cv-792-Orl-31KRS (M.D. Fla. Apr. 4, 2006)