From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lentz v. ThoughtWorks, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 12, 2022
20-CV-7043 (PGG) (OTW) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 12, 2022)

Opinion

20-CV-7043 (PGG) (OTW)

07-12-2022

TIFFANY LENTZ, Plaintiff, v. THOUGHTWORKS INC. and KISHORE RACHAPUDI, Defendants.


ORDER

ONA T. WANG, United States Magistrate Judge:

Defendants' response is due August 5, 2022. Defendants may attach their own chart to their letter brief stating their objections. There shall be no replies. The letter briefs shall not exceed three pages.

The Court has reviewed ECF Nos. 57 and 58. Plaintiff is directed to file one letter brief explicating which discovery responses are at issue regarding her Motion to Compel. Plaintiff shall attach to the letter brief a chart outlining the document requests at issue, Defendants' responses to those document requests, and the relevance of the requested documents to Plaintiff's case. Plaintiff shall file her letter brief by July 22, 2022.

The parties shall also outline any other outstanding discovery in their respective letter briefs.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lentz v. ThoughtWorks, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 12, 2022
20-CV-7043 (PGG) (OTW) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 12, 2022)
Case details for

Lentz v. ThoughtWorks, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TIFFANY LENTZ, Plaintiff, v. THOUGHTWORKS INC. and KISHORE RACHAPUDI…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 12, 2022

Citations

20-CV-7043 (PGG) (OTW) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 12, 2022)