From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lentilhon v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 8, 1906
77 N.E. 1184 (N.Y. 1906)

Opinion

Argued April 20, 1906

Decided May 8, 1906

L. Laflin Kellogg and Alfred C. Pette for appellant.

John J. Delany, Corporation Counsel ( Theodore Connoly and Terence Farley of counsel), for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, HAIGHT, VANN, WILLARD BARTLETT and CHASE, JJ. Not voting: EDWARD T. BARTLETT, J.


Summaries of

Lentilhon v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 8, 1906
77 N.E. 1184 (N.Y. 1906)
Case details for

Lentilhon v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE LENTILHON, Appellant, v . THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 8, 1906

Citations

77 N.E. 1184 (N.Y. 1906)
185 N.Y. 549

Citing Cases

Long v. Athol

As long as the contract remains in force they are bound by its provisions. Stuart v. Cambridge, 125 Mass.…