From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LENT v. CITY OF NEW YORK

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 22, 1934
150 Misc. 291 (N.Y. App. Term 1934)

Opinion

January 22, 1934.

Appeal from the Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, First District.

Arthur J.W. Hilly, Corporation Counsel, for the appellant.

Maurice Breen, for the respondent.


As plaintiff, although appointed as a result of a civil service examination for electrical inspector, performed the duties of an electrician after duly passing a civil service examination for that position, he is entitled to the benefits of subdivision 3 of section 220 Lab. of the Labor Law.

Judgment affirmed, with twenty-five dollars costs.

All concur; present, LYDON, LEVY and CALLAHAN, JJ.


Summaries of

LENT v. CITY OF NEW YORK

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 22, 1934
150 Misc. 291 (N.Y. App. Term 1934)
Case details for

LENT v. CITY OF NEW YORK

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD C. LENT, Respondent, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jan 22, 1934

Citations

150 Misc. 291 (N.Y. App. Term 1934)
269 N.Y.S. 201

Citing Cases

Wood v. City of New York

The Comptroller of the city having paid to the plaintiff some time in 1929 the prevailing rate of $13.20 does…

Maystrik v. City of New York

To the same effect, see Walton v. Mayor ( 26 A.D. 76); Van Dolsen v. Board of Education (29 id. 501); Keane…