From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LENS EXP. v. DEPT. BUS. PROF. REG

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 24, 1995
650 So. 2d 1020 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 94-1773.

January 10, 1995. Rehearing Denied March 24, 1995.

Appeal from the District Court of Appeal, Mickle, J.

David E. Eastman and Carl R. Peterson, Jr. of Parker, Skelding, Labasky, Corry, Eastman Hauser, P.A., Tallahassee, for appellants.

Rosa H. Carson of Carson, Linn Adkins, Tallahassee, for appellees.


We are asked to review a nonfinal administrative order compelling discovery. Via their responsive brief, the Florida Optometric Association brings to our attention the fact that, per Lens Express' motion below, the order from which the instant appeal is taken was modified by the hearing officer after the petition for review had been filed with this court. No appeal has been taken from the modified order. We are therefore without jurisdiction to review either the original or the modified order.

PETITION DISMISSED.

BOOTH and WOLF, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

LENS EXP. v. DEPT. BUS. PROF. REG

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 24, 1995
650 So. 2d 1020 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

LENS EXP. v. DEPT. BUS. PROF. REG

Case Details

Full title:LENS EXPRESS, INC. AND MORDECHAI GOLAN, APPELLANT, v. DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Mar 24, 1995

Citations

650 So. 2d 1020 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)