From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lenhal Realty v. Transamerica Com. Fin

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 30, 1992
611 So. 2d 79 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Summary

holding that the entry of default was error where defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint before the default had been entered

Summary of this case from Sansbury v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Opinion

No. 92-1736.

December 30, 1992.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Lawrence L. Korda, J.

Glen H. Waldman and Nancy W. Gregoire of Ruden, Barnett, McClosky, Smith, Schuster Russell, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Christopher Q. Wintter and Kenneth J. Miller of Wintter Cummings, Hollywood, for appellee Transamerica Commercial Finance Corp.


Lenhal Realty appeals from an order that denies its motion to vacate a default. We reverse.

Appellees' motion for default was set for hearing on March 17, 1992, at 8:45 a.m. Appellants did not attend the hearing, but filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs' complaint and motion to strike at 9:15 a.m. on March 17, as evidenced by the clerk's stamp. At the hearing, the trial court granted appellees' motion for default against appellants; however, that order was not stamped in by the Clerk of the Court until the following day, March 18, 1992. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.500(c) provides that "a party may plead or otherwise defend at any time before default is entered." In Graves v. Giordano, 590 So.2d 1113 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), we agreed with our sister court in Chester, Blackburn Roder, Inc. v. Marchese, 383 So.2d 734, 735 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), that "an order may not be deemed to have been entered, notwithstanding its having been signed by the court, until it is actually filed with the clerk." Since at the time the order granting default was entered, appellant had already filed its motion to dismiss, entry of default was error. Graves.

Accordingly, we reverse the order denying appellant's motion to set aside the default and remand for further proceedings.

GUNTHER, POLEN and FARMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lenhal Realty v. Transamerica Com. Fin

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 30, 1992
611 So. 2d 79 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

holding that the entry of default was error where defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint before the default had been entered

Summary of this case from Sansbury v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Case details for

Lenhal Realty v. Transamerica Com. Fin

Case Details

Full title:LENHAL REALTY, INC., APPELLANT, v. TRANSAMERICA COMMERCIAL FINANCE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Dec 30, 1992

Citations

611 So. 2d 79 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

Dessberg v. Sarasota Harbor E. Ass'n

• The clerk filed the trial court's order granting the motion for default at 4:42 p.m. Somewhat similar…

Sansbury v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Id. at 614–15. See also Drake v. Pub. Health Tr. of Dade Cty., 832 So.2d 172 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (ruling that,…