From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lemus-Herrera v. I.N.S.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 13, 2001
26 F. App'x 650 (9th Cir. 2001)

Opinion


26 Fed.Appx. 650 (9th Cir. 2001) Ricardo Gabriel LEMUS-HERRERA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 97-70983. I & NS No. A36 894 665. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. December 13, 2001

Submitted April 17, 2001 .

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Alien appealed determination of Board of Immigration Appeals that he was statutorily ineligible for relief under Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). The Court of Appeals held that it lacked jurisdiction under transitional rules of Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA).

Dismissed.

On Petition for Review of An order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Before PREGERSON, FERNANDEZ, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Ricardo Lemus-Herrera, a native and citizen of Mexico, appeals the Board of Immigration Appeals' determination that he is statutorily ineligible for relief under the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA"), § 212(c). We dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction.

This case is governed by the transitional rules of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 ("IIRIRA") because Lemus-Herrera was

Page 651.

placed in exclusion proceedings before April 1, 1997, and his final exclusion order was filed after October 30, 1996. See Hose v. INS, 180 F.3d 992, 995 (9th Cir.1999) (en banc). Under the transitional rules, we lack jurisdiction over appeals by aliens who are "inadmissible or deportable by reason of having committed a criminal offense covered in section 212(a)(2) or section 241(a)(2)(A)(iii), (B), (C), or (D) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ...." IIRIRA § 309(c)(4)(G). In this case, Lemus-Herrera concedes that he is excludable under INA § 212(a)(2)(i)(II).

Accordingly, we dismiss this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction. See Magana-Pizano v. INS, 200 F.3d 603, 607 (9th Cir.1999) (holding that IIRIRA § 309(c)(4)(G) repealed this court's jurisdiction over petitions for review filed by aliens who are deportable for having committed enumerated criminal offenses, but did not repeal 28 U.S.C. § 2241).

Petition DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Lemus-Herrera v. I.N.S.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 13, 2001
26 F. App'x 650 (9th Cir. 2001)
Case details for

Lemus-Herrera v. I.N.S.

Case Details

Full title:Ricardo Gabriel LEMUS-HERRERA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Dec 13, 2001

Citations

26 F. App'x 650 (9th Cir. 2001)