Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV211-071.
August 1, 2011
ORDER
After an independent and de novo review of the record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which Objections have been filed. In his Objections, Gonzalez claims he was not aware of the charges against him during his criminal proceeding because he was under the influence of medication. Gonzalez' Objections fail to address his failure to identify a new retroactively applicable Supreme Court decision establishing he was convicted of a nonexistent offense. He does not satisfy the savings clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255.
Gonzalez' Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation are without merit. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted as the opinion of the Court. Gonzalez's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition is DISMISSED.