From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lemelle v. Villareal

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jun 8, 2015
CV 14-6676-DMG (AS) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 8, 2015)

Opinion

          Michael LeMelle, Plaintiff, Pro se, Lancaster, CA.

          For Eligio Villarreal, sued in their individual capacity, Murrietta, sued in their individual capacity, J. Williams, sued in their individual capacity, A. Hodges, sued in their individual capacity, Defendants: Cassandra Jean Shryock, CAAG - Office of the Attorney General, California Department of Justice, Los Angeles, CA.


          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all of the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge as to the claims against defendants Williams and Hodges and the due process claims against defendant Villareal, to which no objections were filed. The Court accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge with regard to the dismissal of certain claims.

         IT IS ORDERED that all claims asserted against defendants J. Williams and A. Hodges are dismissed without prejudice, and the due process claim against defendant E. Villareal is dismissed without prejudice.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Orderon Plaintiff at his current address of record.


Summaries of

Lemelle v. Villareal

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jun 8, 2015
CV 14-6676-DMG (AS) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 8, 2015)
Case details for

Lemelle v. Villareal

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL LEMELLE, Plaintiff, v. E. VILLAREAL, et. al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jun 8, 2015

Citations

CV 14-6676-DMG (AS) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 8, 2015)