From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lemelle v. Rakitan

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 28, 2022
21-09463 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2022)

Opinion

21-09463 BLF (PR)

03-28-2022

MICHAEL S. LEMELLE, Plaintiff, v. RAKITAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

BETH LABSON FREEMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the officers at Salinas Valley State Prison (“S.V.S.P.”). Dkt. No. 1. The matter was originally assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim, who had Plaintiff's consent. Dkt. No. 5. On February 22, 2022, Magistrate Judge Kim dismissed the complaint with leave to amend, to correct various deficiencies. Dkt. No. 7. Plaintiff was directed to file an amended complaint within twenty-eight days from the date the order was filed and advised that failure to respond would result in the dismissal of the action without further notice to Plaintiff. Id. at 3. When the deadline passed without a response from Plaintiff, the matter was reassigned to this Court on March 24, 2022, pursuant to Williams v. King, 875 F.3d 500, 502-05 (9th Cir. 2017). Dkt. No. 8. 1

Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint in the time provided. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to file an amended complaint. The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 2


Summaries of

Lemelle v. Rakitan

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 28, 2022
21-09463 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Lemelle v. Rakitan

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL S. LEMELLE, Plaintiff, v. RAKITAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Mar 28, 2022

Citations

21-09463 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2022)