Opinion
Civil Action No. 13-cv-02840-BNB
11-01-2013
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
Plaintiff, Ann Lemberg, resides in Denver, Colorado. On October 17, 2013, she filed pro se a Complaint (ECF No. 1) and a Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (ECF No. 3). She was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to § 1915.
On October 18, 2013, Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland ordered Ms. Lemberg to file within thirty days an amended Complaint that complied with the pleading requirements of Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Instead of complying with the October 18 order, Ms. Lemberg, on October 29, 2013, filed a notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice.
Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Ms. Lemberg "may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment." No response has been filed by any Respondent in this action. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(B), the dismissal is without prejudice, unless otherwise stated. A voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A) is effective immediately upon the filing of a written notice of dismissal, and no subsequent court order is necessary. See J. Moore, Moore's Federal Practice ¶ 41.02(2) (2d ed. 1995); Hyde Constr. Co. v. Koehring Co., 388 F.2d 501, 507 (10th Cir. 1968). The notice closes the file. See Hyde Constr. Co., 388 F.2d at 507.
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the instant action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice (ECF No. 5) that Plaintiff, Am Lemberg, filed pro se on October 29, 2013. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the voluntary dismissal is effective as of October 29, the date the notice of voluntary dismissal was filed in this action.
DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 1st day of November, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
____________________________
LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge
United States District Court