From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leland v. Hornbeck

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 20, 2008
No. CIV S-07-0881 WBS KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-0881 WBS KJM P.

October 20, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis, sought relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This action was terminated on September 2, 2008. On October 3, 2008, petitioner filed a notice of appeal and a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.

Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure provides as follows:

a party who has been permitted to proceed in an action in the district court in forma pauperis . . . may proceed on appeal in forma pauperis without further authorization unless . . . the district court shall certify that the appeal is not taken in good faith or shall find that the party is otherwise not entitled so to proceed. . . .

Fed.R.App. 24. Since the district court has not certified that petitioner's appeal is not taken in good faith or otherwise found that petitioner is not entitled to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal will be denied as unnecessary.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's October 3, 2008 motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (docket #29) is denied as unnecessary. See Fed.R.App.P. 24.


Summaries of

Leland v. Hornbeck

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 20, 2008
No. CIV S-07-0881 WBS KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2008)
Case details for

Leland v. Hornbeck

Case Details

Full title:RHONDA LEE LELAND, Petitioner, v. TINA HORNBECK, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 20, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-07-0881 WBS KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2008)