Opinion
July 20, 1971.
Editorial Note:
This case has been marked 'not for publication' by the court.
Martin A. Kane, Denver, for plaintiff in error.
Feder & Morris, Harold A. Feder, Denver, for defendant in error.
ENOCH, Judge.
This case was transferred from the Supreme Court pursuant to statute.
This is a domestic relations case and the sole issue raised by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in entering its orders relating to the division of property.
We find no merit in the alleged errors. The particular provisions of the trial court's order concerning the property division of which the wife complains are supported by the evidence. The testimony in alimony and property settlement matters is reviewed in the light most favorable to the prevailing party. The division of property between husband and wife in a divorce action is a matter resting within the sound discretion of the trial judge and if supported by competent evidence, will not be disturbed on review. Gleason v. Gleason, 162 Colo. 212, 425 P.2d 688.
Judgment affirmed.
COYTE and DUFFORD, JJ., concur.