From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leids v. Met Life Home Loans

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - LOS ANGELES DIVISION
Oct 13, 2011
CASE NO.: CV09-7016-DMG (RZx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO.: CV09-7016-DMG (RZx)

10-13-2011

ASHER LEIDS, An Individual, and LISA LEIDS, an Individual, Plaintiffs, v. MET LIFE HOME LOANS, a division of METLIFE BANK, N.A., a Delaware Corporation, and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants.


ORDER ON STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION [50]

Pursuant to the Stipulation by Plaintiffs Asher Leids and Lisa Leids and Defendant MET LIFE HOME LOANS (the "Parties") to dismiss this action, with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and based upon the Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release executed between and among the Parties,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety, with each party to bear its or his own costs and attorneys fees.

Hon. Dolly M. Gee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Leids v. Met Life Home Loans

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - LOS ANGELES DIVISION
Oct 13, 2011
CASE NO.: CV09-7016-DMG (RZx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Leids v. Met Life Home Loans

Case Details

Full title:ASHER LEIDS, An Individual, and LISA LEIDS, an Individual, Plaintiffs, v…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - LOS ANGELES DIVISION

Date published: Oct 13, 2011

Citations

CASE NO.: CV09-7016-DMG (RZx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2011)