From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leidenfrost v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Nov 28, 2005
706 N.W.2d 56 (Minn. 2005)

Opinion

No. A05-1666.

November 28, 2005.

Appeal from Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals.

Christopher E. Sandquist, Gislason Hunter, LLP, Mankato, MN, Carl J. Sommerer, Sommerer Schultz, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for Relators.

Kris Wittwer, Steward, Zlimen Jungers, Ltd., Minneapolis, MN, for Intervenor, Abbott Northwestern Hospital.

Considered and decided by the court en banc.


ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed July 25, 2005, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Russell A. Anderson Associate Justice


Summaries of

Leidenfrost v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Nov 28, 2005
706 N.W.2d 56 (Minn. 2005)
Case details for

Leidenfrost v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Cindy LEIDENFROST, Respondent, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., and…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Nov 28, 2005

Citations

706 N.W.2d 56 (Minn. 2005)