From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leibowitz v. Locke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 16, 1995
220 A.D.2d 562 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

October 16, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Goldstein, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court did not err in concluding that the plaintiff could not properly change the venue of his Nassau County action by the simple expedient of serving on the defendants an amended complaint pursuant to CPLR 3025 (a), designating Kings County as the place of trial. CPLR 510 provides that a court may change the venue of an action only "upon motion." Sullivan, J.P., Miller, Copertino, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Leibowitz v. Locke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 16, 1995
220 A.D.2d 562 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Leibowitz v. Locke

Case Details

Full title:RODNEY P. LEIBOWITZ, Appellant, v. RICHARD LOCKE et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 16, 1995

Citations

220 A.D.2d 562 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
632 N.Y.S.2d 611