To determine whether the moving party exercised diligence, “courts typically consider the amount of time between the discovery of new information and when the party requested leave to amend.” Leibel v. City of Buckeye, No. CV-18-01743-PHX-DWL, 2019 WL 4736784, at *2 (D. Ariz. Sept. 27, 2019) (citing Zivkovic v. S. Cal. Edison Co., 302 F.3d 1080, 1087-88 (9th Cir. 2002)). “Allowing parties to amend based on [new] information obtained through discovery is common and well established

” Leibel v. City of Buckeye, No. 18-cv-01743, 2019 WL 4736784, at *3 (D. Ariz. Sept. 27, 2019) (quotation omitted). Defendants' “arguments to the sufficiency of the proposed amendment, even if merited, remain better left for full briefing on a motion to dismiss.”

See Leibel v. City of Buckeye, No. CV-18-01743-PHX-DWL, 2019 WL 4736784, *3 (D. Ariz. Sept. 27, 2019). But those are not the circumstances here.