From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Legrand v. Ganich

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 6, 2014
122 A.D.3d 411 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

11-06-2014

Regine LEGRAND, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Guilene GANICH, et al., Defendants–Appellants.

Paula Schwartz Frome, Garden City, for appellants. Law Office of Frederic R. Abramson, New York (Frederic R. Abramson of counsel), for respondent.


Paula Schwartz Frome, Garden City, for appellants.

Law Office of Frederic R. Abramson, New York (Frederic R. Abramson of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Arthur F. Engoron, J.), entered April 22, 2013, against defendants in plaintiff's favor in the aggregate amount of $81,121.92, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Following a nonjury trial, the court concluded that plaintiff made a loan to defendants rather than an equity investment in their business. This decision, which was based on the credibility of the witnesses, is entitled to deference, and could have been reached under a fair interpretation of the evidence (see e.g. Thoreson v. Penthouse Intl., 80 N.Y.2d 490, 495, 591 N.Y.S.2d 978, 606 N.E.2d 1369 [1992] ; Matter of Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 86 A.D.3d 314, 320, 927 N.Y.S.2d 67 [1st Dept.2011] ).

MAZZARELLI, J.P., ACOSTA, DeGRASSE, CLARK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Legrand v. Ganich

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 6, 2014
122 A.D.3d 411 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Legrand v. Ganich

Case Details

Full title:Regine LEGRAND, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Guilene GANICH, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 6, 2014

Citations

122 A.D.3d 411 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
122 A.D.3d 411
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 7577

Citing Cases

Sec. Pac. Nat'l Bank v. Evans

As articulated by the Court of Appeals, the standard of review on an appeal from a decision based on findings…

DiLorenzo v. Windermere Owners LLC

g court should not be disturbed upon appeal unless it is obvious that the court's conclusions could not be…