From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leger v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 14, 2002
818 So. 2d 697 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. 5D02-1349.

June 14, 2002.

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County, G. Richard Singeltary, Judge.

Paul Leger, Tavares, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.


This is an appeal from a non-final order denying some of Leger's grounds contained in his 3.850 motion, but scheduling an evidentiary hearing as to one ground. As such, the appeal is premature and unauthorized. See Gowins v. State, 662 So.2d 1348 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). Therefore, the appeal is dismissed sua sponte for lack of jurisdiction. See Cervino v. State, 785 So.2d 631 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). Of course, this is without prejudice to Leger to appeal once the trial court disposes of the 3.850 motion with finality.

DISMISSED.

SHARP, W., and ORFINGER, KB., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Leger v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 14, 2002
818 So. 2d 697 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Leger v. State

Case Details

Full title:PAUL LEGER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jun 14, 2002

Citations

818 So. 2d 697 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Ramkhelawan v. State

Because the motion which Defendant sought to supplement is still pending resolution, we find that this is an…

Ramkhelawan v. State

Because the motion which Defendant sought to supplement is still pending resolution, we find that this is an…