From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LEGANOWICZ v. RONE

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1933
240 App. Div. 731 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)

Opinion

June, 1933.


Order denying motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order herein. The hearing before the division of licenses was not a judicial proceeding and the charges, therefore, were not protected by an absolute privilege. They may, however, have a qualified privilege. Lazansky, P.J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

LEGANOWICZ v. RONE

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1933
240 App. Div. 731 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
Case details for

LEGANOWICZ v. RONE

Case Details

Full title:FRANK LEGANOWICZ, Respondent, v. JAMES E. RONE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1933

Citations

240 App. Div. 731 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)

Citing Cases

Studley, Inc. v. Lefrak

We acknowledge that the rule of qualified privilege has been a traditional point of departure in the analysis…

Longo v. Tauriello

In such cases the privilege is the qualified one that attaches to the honest assertion of a right or…