From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leftenant v. Blackmon

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 6, 2022
2:18-cv-01948-EJY (D. Nev. Apr. 6, 2022)

Opinion

2:18-cv-01948-EJY

04-06-2022

NATHAN LEFTENANT, ARNETT LEFTENANT, JERYL BRIGHT, GREGORY JOHNSON, and THOMAS “TOMI” JENKINS, Plaintiffs, v. LAWRENCE “LARRY” BLACKMON, Defendant. LAWRENCE “LARRY” BLACKMON, Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. NATHAN LEFTENANT, ARNETT LEFTENANT, JERYL BRIGHT, GREGORY JOHNSON, and THOMAS “TOMI” JENKINS, Counterclaim Defendants.


ORDER

ELAYNA J. YOUCHAH, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion to Extend Time to Reply (ECF No. 339). Plaintiffs seek a short extension of time to file a Reply in support of their Motion to Extend Time to Pay Sanctions (ECF No. 334). The extension is sought because Plaintiffs made a proposal to Defendant regarding payment of sanctions ordered by the Court that if accepted will moot the underlying motion.

Accordingly, given the information presented and the short extension requested, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Extend Time to Reply (ECF No. 339) is GRANTED. 1

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Reply in support of their Motion to Extend Time to Pay Sanctions shall be due April 11, 2022. 2


Summaries of

Leftenant v. Blackmon

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 6, 2022
2:18-cv-01948-EJY (D. Nev. Apr. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Leftenant v. Blackmon

Case Details

Full title:NATHAN LEFTENANT, ARNETT LEFTENANT, JERYL BRIGHT, GREGORY JOHNSON, and…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Apr 6, 2022

Citations

2:18-cv-01948-EJY (D. Nev. Apr. 6, 2022)