From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leffebre v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 23, 2013
Civil Action No. 13-cv-02071-BNB (D. Colo. Dec. 23, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 13-cv-02071-BNB

12-23-2013

ANDRE LEFFEBRE, Plaintiff, v. BLAKE R. DAVIS, DAVID BERKEBILE, CAPTAIN KRIST, J. COULSON, R. DERR, CHRISTOPHER B. SYNSVOLL, A. OSAGIE, and D. ALFRED, Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

On September 6, 2013, the Court denied Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 because he is subject to the filing restriction in § 1915(g). The Court also ordered Plaintiff to pay the full amount of $400.00 ($350.00 filing fee, plus a $50.00 administrative fee) within thirty days if he wishes to pursue his claims in this action. The Court warned Plaintiff that the action would be dismissed without further notice if he failed to pay the filing fee within thirty days.

On November 29, 2013, Plaintiff's appeal from the order denying him leave to proceed in forma pauperis was dismissed and the mandate was issued. On December 2, 2013, Plaintiff was directed by minute order to pay the full amount of $400.00 on or before December 16, 2013, and he again was advised that the action would be dismissed without further notice if he failed to pay the full amount of $400.00.

Plaintiff has failed within the time allowed to pay the filing and administrative fees as directed and he has failed to respond in any way to the December 2 minute order. Therefore, the action will be dismissed for failure to pay the required filing and administrative fees.

Furthermore, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status will be denied for the purpose of appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). If Plaintiff files a notice of appeal he also must pay the full $505 appellate filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit within thirty days in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 24. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the complaint and the action are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because Plaintiff failed to pay the required filing and administrative fees as directed. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied without prejudice to the filing of a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 23rd day of December, 2013.

BY THE COURT:

_________________________

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Leffebre v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 23, 2013
Civil Action No. 13-cv-02071-BNB (D. Colo. Dec. 23, 2013)
Case details for

Leffebre v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:ANDRE LEFFEBRE, Plaintiff, v. BLAKE R. DAVIS, DAVID BERKEBILE, CAPTAIN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Dec 23, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 13-cv-02071-BNB (D. Colo. Dec. 23, 2013)