From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lefcourt v. Kilpatrick (In re A.P.S.L.)

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Jun 16, 2021
320 So. 3d 345 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 2D20-2782

06-16-2021

In the INTEREST OF A.P.S.L, a child. Mark Stephen Lefcourt, Appellant, v. Adrienne Michelle Kilpatrick, Appellee.

Mark Stephen Lefcourt, pro se. Adrienne Michelle Kilpatrick, pro se.


Mark Stephen Lefcourt, pro se.

Adrienne Michelle Kilpatrick, pro se.

PER CURIAM. Dismissed as moot. See Troike v. Troike , 271 So. 3d 1069, 1072-73 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (holding that the previous order modifying "timesharing without appropriate due process" was moot after the trial court issued a subsequent order "that reinstated some unsupervised timesharing"); see also Stover v. Stover , 287 So. 3d 1277, 1278-79 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020) (holding that the timesharing issue was moot because the temporary injunction expired and the timesharing award was no longer in effect).

LaROSE, SLEET, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Lefcourt v. Kilpatrick (In re A.P.S.L.)

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Jun 16, 2021
320 So. 3d 345 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Lefcourt v. Kilpatrick (In re A.P.S.L.)

Case Details

Full title:In the Interest of A.P.S.L, a child. MARK STEPHEN LEFCOURT, Appellant, v…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

Date published: Jun 16, 2021

Citations

320 So. 3d 345 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)