Opinion
No. 05-03-01507-CR
Opinion Filed February 23, 2005. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F03-50348-VH. Affirmed.
Before Justices MORRIS, FRANCIS, and LANG-MIERS.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Cheryl Lefall appeals her conviction, on her open guilty plea, for possession of cocaine in an amount less than one gram. Punishment, enhanced by two prior felony convictions, was assessed at four years confinement. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant she has a right to file a pro se response. Appellant, however, did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.