From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leeper v. Tinkey

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Nov 16, 2017
174 A.3d 571 (Pa. 2017)

Opinion

No. 194 WAL 2017

11-16-2017

Randy LEEPER and Connie Leeper, Petitioners v. James TINKEY, Dean Tinkey, Ralph Tinkey, and Harold Tinkey, Individually and/or t/d/b/a Tinkey Brothers Lumber Company, and/or Tinkey Bros.: J. R. Enos, Individually and or t/d/b/a Paul Bunyan Tree Service; Paul Bunyan Tree Service; Patrick Monroe; Joseph C. Monroe; Rosalle Cotton, Executrix of the Estate of Joseph A. Monroe, Deceased; Lillian Fay Monroe; EOG Resources, Inc., Crown Communications; Crown Castle USA, t/d/b/a Crown Communications; and Crown Castle International, Respondents


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of November, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.


Summaries of

Leeper v. Tinkey

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Nov 16, 2017
174 A.3d 571 (Pa. 2017)
Case details for

Leeper v. Tinkey

Case Details

Full title:Randy LEEPER and Connie Leeper, Petitioners v. James TINKEY, Dean Tinkey…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Date published: Nov 16, 2017

Citations

174 A.3d 571 (Pa. 2017)