Opinion
No. 1D19-4546
01-29-2020
Christopher Crawford, Pensacola, for Petitioner. No appearance for Respondents.
Christopher Crawford, Pensacola, for Petitioner.
No appearance for Respondents.
Per Curiam.
To the extent that Petitioner seeks certiorari relief, the "petition for writ of certiorari or mandamus" is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Landmark at Crescent Ridge LP v. Everest Financial, Inc. , 219 So. 3d 218, 219 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (explaining that where the threshold jurisdictional requirement of irreparable harm is not shown, the petition for writ of certiorari should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction). To the extent that Petitioner seeks mandamus relief, the petition is denied on the merits. See Holland v. Wainwright , 499 So. 2d 21 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (explaining that a petition for writ of mandamus must show failure to perform a ministerial duty).
Wolf, B.L. Thomas, and Roberts, JJ., concur.